Search results

Ah that makes sense. When you listen at lower volumes.... So you want to keep that downward curve. Just fix to a small degree the peaks around 40, 80 and 120 the bass will get less muddy and become more clean and precise. The overall clarity will improve. Don't make it touch the yellow line it...

Set the house curve algo to only cuts . From 20-250hz and max cut to be 3 db and filters 3 . Check the recommended peq settings insert them to Wiim and tell me if you like it. If you haven’t bought it yet buy it . For very little money you get nice results

I get you. But you need minimum 2 subs to get an even bass, 4 being ideal.

Upgrading speakers and adding subwoofers time alignment and all that stuff can be very expensive especially when you already have good speakers and you want to do a meaningful upgrade .So the streamer dac can play a role in sound quality (source is always important )and be a much cheaper upgrade...

Is your name Russel or Teapot? :D

if it sounds great and that greatness corresponds to correctness that is +-3db degrees radius on a downward slope of -10 to -12db, then wiim should have a way to suggest that no correction is required to be performed. However as I said wiim maybe has a problem with how it applies compensation to...

80 hz is a usual suspect for room modes that can exaggerate the magnitude. Moreover you can have resonance from your speaker itself or have them too close to the wall or corner . On top of that it maybe the exaggerated compensation applied from the wiim starts from 80hz (what I quoted was from...

I see a possible problem with the compensation applied when recording a measurement. If compensation is too high in db the sum of actual captured low frequencies + db boost of compensation would result in a measured bass level that would require more correction - but wrongly. Therefore the thin...

How is upsampling going ?! Anybody tested it in beta ? Do you find differences in sound quality ?

To be honest the corrected wiim response looks logical but again it should not correct so aggressively in order for the curve to lie exactly on the downward line. On the other hand the measured is not looking good at all. I don't know if it is your system-speakers and/or the placement or even...

If you performed an in room response measurement and more or less your uncorrected curve follows B&K or Harman in a boundary between +-3db you do not need eq and if you do you need to apply only to taste . For instance I changed the mixture to a more bassy one by applying a high shelf filter...

I would say that above 250 hz the corrections should not have higher q than 1 and no more than 3db

definitely...

The less eq bands you need to apply the better with respect to sound quality . So sometimes it is useful to restrict bands to check on the results of the algorithm , they may achieve the same result with less bands … too much eq is not good too high q above Schroeder is also not good . Too much...

So you don’t have this issue or others don’t have it ?

Does it seem odd only to me that the engineers at Wiim did not notice that behaviour after all this time ?

Eq applied is wrong

My guess is that is subtle and nobody cares. On top of that it will happen with use so there is no choice on that

None

I think it works in electronics . Almost all when new sound more bright