steadyshot
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 675
Because the mentality in ASR is if something exists we should already have measured it. If not it is placeboI have no idea why you think I'm suggesting such a thing.
Because the mentality in ASR is if something exists we should already have measured it. If not it is placeboI have no idea why you think I'm suggesting such a thing.
It's not the ASR mentality. Existence of anything is based on the proof of being detected or measured if you prefer such word. That's the contradiction to beliefs.Because the mentality in ASR is if something exists we should already have measured it. If not it is placebo
Different approaches complement each other. It's always weird to me why it's so hard to understand by some people. You can negate the value of scientific way, I do not care. I use both.If you would replace esoteric with emotional you get my signature
For me there is nothing more unsexy and unemotional than a graph. But I am sure we are not really far away from each other because I wouldn't expect you chose your time intensive methods without loving music.
What about matter in the universe ? Can we measure it all currently?It's not the ASR mentality. Existence of anything is based on the proof of being detected or measured if you prefer such word. That's the contradiction to beliefs.
The answer is 42, what was the question again?What about matter in the universe ? Can we measure it all currently?
No point to continue such discussion. Existence of matter itself in unrelated to the proven or unproven existence of every particle we can imagine as being a part of the whole matter.What about matter in the universe ? Can we measure it all currently?
@Achim1811@Maurizio, my Italian friend.
Everything affects everything. For the moment I do not know if it was Mao, Konfuzius or me who said this first.
Of course a DAC has an impact on the sound signature. By the way, makes a steerable sound signature bit-perfect not obsolete? I have to think about....
You know that in my personal universe (the one and only universe where I can see me as the centre) the order is different. In that moment I are absolute happy and satisfied with my stereo I certainly have a look if I can better the sound with another DAC. Very often I got the impression people think that a DAC can bring a remarkable higher level. So, you and every other who read my posts during the last weeks know how I think. In the very moment one owns a decent enough stereo he or she could look at DACs. If that is ok then he or she should go for cables. But, as you and I and many others know: Once in that rabbit hole there is no way out. Or you must own a bassotto who shows you a way out.
Never stop seeking!
Me too I believe in my ears, not measurementsI agree that current measurement methodology is insufficient to capture all sonic differences. And because in the end we have to live with the equipment I prefer to like what I hear!
Measurements and the scientific approach in general tell something about things that our ears cannot detect. Do you negate everything your personal senses didn't experience so far?Me too I believe in my ears, not measurements
Correct then your room acoustic successfully without a proper gear and measurements, just with your ears. Good luck.I will stay that it is never ever the right way to combine only by measurement. It is different with headphones and speakers where frequency response can point you to the direction you want. But even this is absolutely impossible way for every listening situation. Nothing can replace testing in your environment with your existing gear. Would be difficult with no helpful, serious and potent dealer, I know.
And as I said, sum of nonaudible but measurable issues can result in something perfectly audible.For me there is a post in memory which more or less read "not listenable, but you can measure". So, who cares? What can happen?