LMS/Squeezelite Support Mini

T-B

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2022
Messages
45
Moving this here from the thread at the old forum (https://faq-mini.wiimhome.com/support/discussions/topics/72000741459?page=1)

I quote cc, who started that:

<< There are thousands of Logitech Media Server users out there, with a very active forum dedicated to its use. It would be great if Squeezelite support were added to the WiiM Mini to make it a native LMS client, with the full feature set.
https://github.com/ralph-irving/squeezelite >>

There was a suggestion from Wiim Support that LMS was already useable via UPnP/DLNA, which is true, but using that is quite techy and beyond many customers. Captain Paranoia put it well at the old forum:

<< I think the reply from 'WiiM Support' misses the point; WiiM will be accessible via LMS using the UPnP/DLNA, Chromecast or Airplay plugins, but not via the LMS SlimProto protocl, which supports multi-room casting. Since Squeezelite is an open source implementation of the SlimProto renderer, it would seem a fairly easy win to deploy to the WiiM.>>

So, Wiim Support, can you make implementation of LMS/Squeezelite a priority, please, both on the Mini and the upcoming Pro? And personally, It would be interesting to hear Wiim's current plans for this before I buy either of these (great seeming) products.
 
After adding PEQ Filters there was not enough space for Squeezelite on the Mini but it has been added to Pro and Pro Plus.

Quite why PEQ Filters are considered more important I have no idea - https://forum.wiimhome.com/threads/lms-squeezelite-support-mini.26/post-23166
As I’ve said before, I’m not sure that adding the PEQ filters was the reason they couldn’t fit in Squeezelite - they after all had an equaliser function already there so maybe adding PEQ took even less space than Squeezelite needed, small as that might be.
 
Last edited:
The product hype for the new Wiim Amp has reviewers gushing about the sound quality , but I've yet to see one talk about media server integration - they tout all the streaming services instead. I can't imagine owning any audio device that has a primary use only for paid subscriptions.
Which reviewers for the Amp - haven’t seen any.

Plus re media server integration, not only will it have what the current models already have like access to UPNP/DLNA servers like Minimserver, AssetUPNP etc, it also has a USB input for attaching your own storage to access your own media, which will appear as another UPNP music server.
 
Still hoping this happens, but in the meantime for anyone that finds this thread, I'm using the AirPlay bridge plugin which works excellently.
 
Still hoping this happens, but in the meantime for anyone that finds this thread, I'm using the AirPlay bridge plugin which works excellently.
The UPNPBridge plugin is surely better than the airplay bridge which I’d expected to be limited to 24/48, no?
 
Still hoping this happens, but in the meantime for anyone that finds this thread, I'm using the AirPlay bridge plugin which works excellently.
Yes, I'm still here too. I have my Mini working well with UPNP. There are I believe three newer products since the Mini debut, but the Wiim staff note about " passing along the note of LMS integration" has passed it's one year anniversary. Caveat Emptor.
 
The UPNPBridge plugin is surely better than the airplay bridge which I’d expected to be limited to 24/48, no?
It's limited to 16/44.1 ;-)

I might give the UPNPBridge another go, but I had trouble with multiroom sync last time I tried it.
 
It's limited to 16/44.1 ;-)

I might give the UPNPBridge another go, but I had trouble with multiroom sync last time I tried it.
Ok, iirc from what @d6jg has said, one benefit of the Squeezelite client in the other WiiM devices is that they support multiroom sync whereas UPNPBridge doesn’t. But standalone, it happily supports up to 24/192 as that’s what I use on my Mini.
 
Ok, iirc from what @d6jg has said, one benefit of the Squeezelite client in the other WiiM devices is that they support multiroom sync whereas UPNPBridge doesn’t. But standalone, it happily supports up to 24/192 as that’s what I use on my Mini.
For my purposes, multiroom sync is much more important than higher bit-depth/samplerate. Guess I'll be sticking to the AirPlay plugin until Squeezlite is supported natively. Is there somewhere I should contact the devs to let them know I'd be another SL user on the Wiim mini?
 
For my purposes, multiroom sync is much more important than higher bit-depth/samplerate. Guess I'll be sticking to the AirPlay plugin until Squeezlite is supported natively. Is there somewhere I should contact the devs to let them know I'd be another SL user on the Wiim mini?
Just via the feedback section under settings in the WiiM Home app. The issue with the WiiM Mini is lack of ram/cpu to accommodate the admittedly slim Squeezelite client code. I know there have been gripes about PEQ having been implemented on the Mini instead of Squeezelite, but that could be because of the prospective market size for each, but my guess is that adding PEQ when the Mini already had the code for GEQ was less demanding in terms of memory required.

There was also a suggestion that the Mini could drop other features (like Amazon Music HD support) to accommodate a customised version of firmware. However as it stands WiiM don’t have a means of allowing users to select which firmware they want, plus it’d be an alternative firmware version they’d need to maintain alongside the mainstream version.

I’m afraid I put Squeezelite availability in the same category as Ethernet access, chromecast, airplay casting etc - if you need any of those features then the Pro, Pro Plus or Amp are the models to go for, not the Mini
 
Just via the feedback section under settings in the WiiM Home app. The issue with the WiiM Mini is lack of ram/cpu to accommodate the admittedly slim Squeezelite client code. I know there have been gripes about PEQ having been implemented on the Mini instead of Squeezelite, but that could be because of the prospective market size for each, but my guess is that adding PEQ when the Mini already had the code for GEQ was less demanding in terms of memory required.

There was also a suggestion that the Mini could drop other features (like Amazon Music HD support) to accommodate a customised version of firmware. However as it stands WiiM don’t have a means of allowing users to select which firmware they want, plus it’d be an alternative firmware version they’d need to maintain alongside the mainstream version.

I’m afraid I put Squeezelite availability in the same category as Ethernet access, chromecast, airplay casting etc - if you need any of those features then the Pro, Pro Plus or Amp are the models to go for, not the Mini
Problem is, I already have 5 minis. I have no problem with the AirPlay plugin, it's just another point of failure. And it does fail from time to time.
 
Problem is, I already have 5 minis. I have no problem with the AirPlay plugin, it's just another point of failure. And it does fail from time to time.
Well, upnpbridge isn’t without its issues as well - I think philippe over on the slimdevices forum cringes when WiiM is mentioned ;)
 
Ok, iirc from what @d6jg has said, one benefit of the Squeezelite client in the other WiiM devices is that they support multiroom sync whereas UPNPBridge doesn’t. But standalone, it happily supports up to 24/192 as that’s what I use on my Mini.
Correct
 
If you use AirPlay plugin it should sync ok with other SB players but AirPlay is limited to 16/44.1 and a Sync group in LMS is established at the max capability of the lowest player so playing a source at 24/192 to a sync group of a WiiM Mini running AirPlay bridge and say a Pi capable of full 24/192 will downsample to 16/44.1 for both
 
Well, upnpbridge isn’t without its issues as well - I think philippe over on the slimdevices forum cringes when WiiM is mentioned ;)
I seem to be having luck with the UPnP Bridge on my Mini thus far. I might still jump on a Pro at a future price drop, but really what exactly am I missing using the UPnP Bridge vs native Squeezelite at this point?
 
I seem to be having luck with the UPnP Bridge on my Mini thus far. I might still jump on a Pro at a future price drop, but really what exactly am I missing using the UPnP Bridge vs native Squeezelite at this point?
I'd say stability and the ability to sync with other players
 
Stability
Sync
Smart Crossfade
Smart Gain
Smart Gain (or even track/album gain) would be a biggie for me. Like I said, I’ll stand pat until maybe the next deal. It just bugs me that you could get Roon on the mini but not Squeezelite.
 
Smart Gain (or even track/album gain) would be a biggie for me. Like I said, I’ll stand pat until maybe the next deal. It just bugs me that you could get Roon on the mini but not Squeezelite.
I guess WiiM perceive Roon to represent a bigger market but personally I doubt it is.
 
Open source firmware/app/control would be good. That way if the app no longer functions on a phone (I've had that problem with official Logitech app) you can use another free app.

Logitech LMS no longer works on my Android 11, so I would have to keep a really old Gingerbread phone. Thankfull Craig Drummond and similar people have written apps for it.

Plus with standard IP control you can control it via web browser.
 
Open source firmware/app/control would be good. That way if the app no longer functions on a phone (I've had that problem with official Logitech app) you can use another free app.

Logitech LMS no longer works on my Android 11, so I would have to keep a really old Gingerbread phone. Thankfull Craig Drummond and similar people have written apps for it.

Plus with standard IP control you can control it via web browser.
Material by Craig is just that. A totally cross device HTML5 control gui
 
Back
Top