Brantome
Moderator
Now that you mention it, it is running about 4c warmer than my pro
My WiiM Pro Plus (+) tests
- Thread starter onlyoneme
- Start date
Brantome
Moderator
Price is estimated at $220 including remote I believeNice! Puts it right up there in the "excellent" category for SINAD, about the same level as the Schiit Modi 3+. If the Pro+ sells for < $200, it's a no-brainer.
EDIT: if the Modi+ sells around $129, then roughly half of that added to the price of a Pro for the Pro Plus plus remote
Last edited:
.Thx for measuring it
Could be an effect of the vaunted AKM velvet sound?
Hi @BrantomeGood, that's different from my pre production one which is identical to my Pro, although I've put little black feet on it while the Pro has silver
I've lost in the big sea the link to your small feets. Could you link it again? Black and Silver please
is very significantly better ..
for an all in one affordable, it is now consistent with what we can hope for a minimum of current engineering ...
but .. subjectively .. what does it give? for you?
;-)
(a measurement ap32 and imd? in analog)... and
important.. a comparison in toslink spdif in comparison with the pro? under relevant conditions?
but I have no doubt that you will bring us more measures
;-)))
)
for an all in one affordable, it is now consistent with what we can hope for a minimum of current engineering ...
but .. subjectively .. what does it give? for you?
;-)
(a measurement ap32 and imd? in analog)... and
important.. a comparison in toslink spdif in comparison with the pro? under relevant conditions?
but I have no doubt that you will bring us more measures
;-)))
)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2022
- Messages
- 710
It's about 14.2oz (400g), 25% heavier than the WiiM Pro.
Is this a commercially available sample? Is it for sale?Coming soon. At a moment I can tell that my sample unit has an increased space around the coax socket. And a glossy finish of the chassis.
Stay tuned
could be useful to see which filter has been adopted on the side of the dac akm, see think about proposing in wiim home the choice between the different filters offered by the akm if it is possible
;-)
but onlyoneme has the resource and the rigor etc. to quickly give us the essentials of the classic analog measurements.. but also not always the case, interesting digital measurements.. thank you in advance to him.. ;-)
Last edited:
Thanks @Brantome
I think that these small feets could be useful for the next Pro++(with USB and so on). If, it's presumable, i buy that device when it will be on the market my only option to place it is on top of my actual Pro. That bit of air created by the little feets amidst the two i think can help to dissipate some heat.
Furthermore all my devices have their feet from the factory. I should say big feet. The pro++ would be so also in pendant. A note. I hope that they will maintain AKM chip in the Pro next to come.
Brantome
Moderator
As has been reported earlier, the Pro Plus will go on sale from 5th Aug
Witterings
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2022
- Messages
- 205
Is there a confirmed cost in the UK yet?
Brantome
Moderator
No confirmed costs anywhere yet, but it’s expected to be around $220 including remote
There is a nice explanation of reconstruction filters here:
www.audioreviews.org
Reconstruction Filters For Dummies • Music For The Masses
My personal experience and homework about reconstruction filters, with the hope this may be enlightening for some fellow audio enthusiast on their path to better understanding how our devices really work
www.audioreviews.org
@onlyoneme
Great stuff, thank you. As one of my DACs at hand offers such filters I will surely read the whole article, which I didn't yet. It is written in a way that even me as confessing underestimater from graphs
can follow. One line already arrived in my head.
"Summary: DACs produce spurious ultrasonic images. Those need to be taken care of to prevent damage to drivers, and audible sound alterations."
Great stuff, thank you. As one of my DACs at hand offers such filters I will surely read the whole article, which I didn't yet. It is written in a way that even me as confessing underestimater from graphs
can follow. One line already arrived in my head."Summary: DACs produce spurious ultrasonic images. Those need to be taken care of to prevent damage to drivers, and audible sound alterations."
Similar threads
